hahahahaha...

The New Paper publishes many articles, but in my opinion, most of them are just 八卦新闻 la. There is this article which is of HIGH ENTERTAINMENT VALUE that I saw in the 1 Dec 2007 New Paper.

Early Sesame Street: Not Suitable for kids?

"Oscar the Grouch: Too Negative
Cookie Monster: Binges on too many cookies
Bert: Has too-close relationship with male roommate Ernie?

A warning by the creators on volumes one and two of Sesame Street Old School said: "These early Sesame Street episodes are intended for grown-ups, and may not suit the needs of today's preschool children."

Characters that have come under fire

Spongebob Squarepants: He's a talking sponge. Conservative church groups have criticised the character for being rather too close to his friend Patrick. They sometimes hold hands. The creators insist that he is asexual.

 

Barney & Friends: Is Barney just a purple, singing, anthropomorphic, cheerful dinosaur, or is he simply evil? A proliferation of spoof sites so incensed Barney's owners they sued a website for copright infringement when it called the dinosaur " the Anti-Christ". Barney lost.

 

 

Teletubbies: Tinky Winky, unlike Dipsy, La La and Po, is a special Teletubby. Because he is purple and carries a handbag and straight boys don't do that. Or so critics insist.

 

GUFFAW. HAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. But I admire their level of analysis. I have never thought of these before.

Anyway, I'm back from Shooting Camp. Hur, despite plain Hokkien Mee, aching muscles, demoralisation and encouragement, and manifestation of negative thoughts (which means, MORE MENTAL TRAINING), at least it's fine. I believe that there are things which can be improved on though, like my mental, and my character and attitude. I was disappointed in myself many times although it seems fine to other people. I didn't meet my own expectations la.

Or maybe I'm just too serious... Whatever. Senior's Farewell video is pretty funny (: